ETF Lens · home of the Saatvik Score™

Does this fund match your values?

One symbol, ten numbers — and the Saatvik Score™, JMCC's own rating of how closely a North American ETF or share sits with saatvik values. Built in-house, by us, because nobody was rating this market that way.

  • Saatvik Score™ — indigenously developed by JMCC. You will not find it anywhere else
  • Ten market data points beside it, on the same fund, in one place
  • Information only — every number comes with what it does and does not mean

Free public data · no account, nothing stored

In-house · built by JMCC

The Saatvik Score™

India got its first values-based benchmark in June 2026, when BSE launched the Saatvik 100 — a screen that removes what conflicts with ahimsa, compassion towards living beings, and freedom from what is toxic or addictive, and only then looks at the finances. Nothing of the sort existed for the funds our clients actually hold in Canada and the United States. So JMCC built one. The Saatvik Score™ is our own work, our own method, and our own classification list — developed here, for this market.

What gets screened out — the same nine families of business the tradition sets aside:

Open numbers · no account, no sign-up

The popular hundred, in plain figures

Price, price-to-earnings, earnings per share and the 52-week range for the hundred most looked-up ETFs and the hundred most looked-up shares in each of the United States and Canada — four hundred listings, stored here and free to read. Nothing is ranked, nothing is recommended: it is a list of what people ask about, with what the feed last said about it.

Listing Price Day P/E EPS 52-week range In range Yield Market cap

How to read these ten

Every risk number on this page is measured over the same window — the last three years — and every card says so underneath. One window for everybody: the page describes a fund, it does not tailor an answer to you.

  1. Price, 52-week range and trend tell you where the fund is trading, not whether it is cheap.
  2. Price return excludes distributions — read it next to the distribution yield, never alone.
  3. Volatility, deepest fall and monthly consistency describe the ride. Most people sell because of these, not because of returns.
  4. Return per unit of risk puts the two together; it ignores the risk-free rate, so treat it as a rough comparison, not a Sharpe ratio.
  5. Liquidity is the one people forget: a thin ETF costs more to enter and leave than its price suggests.
  6. Tax treatment is not shown, and it is often the difference between two similar funds — that part is worth a conversation.